Providing critical support to nuclear equipment manufacturers and suppliers, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and utilities with a range of services and testing designed to qualify equipment, parts and components for many applications including both mild and harsh nuclear environments to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidelines and to meet industry and plant-specific requirements is a big job. Equipment Qualification (EQ) testing in the nuclear industry is a vital safety activity and many of the equipment and methodologies used can be applied across industries such as aeronauticals, military, automotive, cables/connectors and other industrial areas. Providing testing and engineering consulting services to assist with qualification processes such as determining solutions for components that fail or do not perform well during testing, and the ability to perform analytical calculations (thermal lag, seismic, radiation shielding, etc.) to properly account for environmental conditions at the equipment location are key critical services in (EQ).
Whether seeking military standards, Environmental testing including climatics testing, altitude testing, shock/seismic, dust and so forth, EQ can be in sync with nuclear industry standards. For example, cable testing, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), seismic testing and autoclave testing share equipment and testing procedures.
Here are some of what EQ Testing provides:
- Establish Actual Plant Normal Service Conditions
Using around the clock monitoring instrumentation, engineers can establish actual normal service plant conditions (temperature, radiation, etc.). Actual plant conditions may be less than calculated design conditions offering improvement with the environmental conditions.
- Establish Representative Temperature Profiles
If upper boundary maximum temperature conditions within a given room are the basis for your equipment environmental qualification, having representative time dependent temperature profiles could remove these conservatisms and margins. Engineers provide these time dependent temperature profiles using appropriate calculations and/or software tools.
- Evaluation of Failure Criteria
An evaluation can determine the particular types of accident conditions the piece of equipment being tested will need to respond to. For instance, if the specified equipment is required to operate following a High Energy Line Break (HELB), but not a Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA), the conditions corresponding to the HELB will be used to evaluate the corresponding environmental conditions, rather than defaulting to the generic “worst” case conditions.
- Failure Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Engineers can evaluate the overall effect on plant safety by evaluating the potential equipment failure modes of safety related equipment during the various stages of plant operation. If, for example, the selected piece of equipment does not impact the safe shutdown of a plant, potentially the piece of equipment can perform its safety function even though it may not be qualified for the environmental conditions.
- Industry Experience Data Mining
Up-to-date Industry experience and databases are available to assess instrument qualification profiles.
- Location Specific Evaluations
Rather than using a conservative broad zone to categorize the conditions a piece of equipment will be exposed to, qualified engineers can also determine location specific conditions. This includes the ability to perform thermal lag or radiation shielding calculations to properly account for equipment location.
- Vendor Test Reports Data Mining
A complete review of vendor qualification reports can provide additional margin. In addition, if you have acquired a new revision of a particular piece of equipment, it may be possible that new qualification data may expand upon the qualified criteria.
Specific testing and equipment can include:
• Design Basis Accident Testing
Autoclaves or state-of-the-art stainless steel Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) chambers and test facilities can easily achieve the required temperature and pressure transients representative of harsh environments for all existing and new Generation III+ reactors. In addition to testing chambers, High Energy Line Break (HELB) testing equipment is available to qualify components for mild environments.
• Aging Services, EMC, EMI And Seismic Qualification
Testing and aging services qualifies components including thermal and irradiation aging, EMC/EMI and seismic qualification.
• Activation Energy Determination, Material Testing, Forensics and Identification
Utilizing extensive databases of activation energies engineers can provide referenced activation energy values for numerous components. A complete laboratory can perform actual activation energy tests using test instruments such as micro-watt calorimetry, DSC, TGA and others. Material testing labs can also be equipped with instruments including a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometer utilized for various applications related to Material Forensics and Identification testing to identify what the component material is and to perform forensics. Additionally, aged materials can be evaluated to determine the response of the material as a result of the environment conditions. Material Performance testing can be delivered using INSTRON material property test rig which is able to perform industry standard tests including tensile strength and strain to determine mechanical properties of components.
Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment According to IEEE 344
Class 1E equipment for nuclear power generating stations is safety related equipment that is essential for safe shut down of the reactor. It has to be safe in case of seismic activity. In other words, it must be assured that the equipment performs as designed during and after a seismic event. A qualification that guarantees this can be obtained by testing the equipment on a seismic shake table. The qualification can be obtained by following IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) standard 344, which contains the recommended practices for seismic qualification of class 1E equipment for nuclear power generating stations. The practices should be used to ensure that the equipment can meet its performance requirements during and following one safe shutdown earthquake.
Fundamental knowledge of mechanical vibrations is required when analyzing the effects of a seismic event on plant equipment. The following is a brief review of vibration theory:
Figure 1 can be understood as a simplified schematic of a plant component, such as a pump or an electrical cabinet, mounted to the ground. During an earthquake, the ground undergoes motion, which is called base excitation. Depending on the stiffness, mass and damping characteristic of the component, the equipment will undergo a vibratory motion (response). The response can be violent if the frequency of the base excitation coincides with one of the natural frequencies of the component. This is called resonance. A resonance situation is to be avoided at all times. A seismic event consists of an irregular time history of base displacements. However, it typically covers a certain frequency range, which is based on the geographical location of the site. Consequently, the component should be designed in a way that it does not exhibit any natural frequencies in the range of the expected earthquake frequencies. Damping can dissipate some of the energy of the vibratory response. Additional damping by dashpots or frictional plants can be an option if the natural frequency cannot be sufficiently designed “away”.
The equipment to be tested is mounted in a plant typical arrangement to the table. Before any testing, the equipment should be checked for functionality. Once the functionality is assured, either a sine sweep resonance search or a multi frequency random noise excitation is conducted to detect the natural frequencies of the equipment. This is also done to demonstrate that the mounting configuration is sufficiently rigid. For that activity the equipment is typically instrumented with a sufficient number of accelerometers. The equipment will then undergo five (5) Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) and finally one (1) Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) profiles. The Required Response Spectra (RRS) for these tests constitute a requirement to be met by the shake table time history motion. The RRS are predetermined by analysis and entered into the controller of the seismic table. They depend on various factors such as the location, the building and the bedrock. During the test, the accelerometers are used to record the Test Response Spectra (TRS). The TRS must exceed or envelope the RRS, which is typically shown by overlaid plots. The equipment shall be in operational mode during the tests and monitored for performance. A post test functionality check shall also be performed. If the equipment performs well, is free of material failures, structurally intact and the TRS exceeded the requirement, then the equipment can be classified as Class 1E. Figure 2 is a photograph of a component that was tested on a seismic shake table.
It is important to note that the IEEE 344 standard includes further practices than presented here. The presented is one example of how to obtain seismic Class 1E qualification.
Testing engineering labs can offer a complete turn-key EQ program along with a la carte testing service programs. Nuclear industry looks for Qualification of components for AP1000TM and Qualification of cables for a BWR plant, for example, but engineering teams with proven experience in all phases of EQ regularly address challenging issues including forensic analysis of failed components, determination of cause of failure and subsequent design or reverse engineering of a solution.
For more information or discussion, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. www.fauske.com