Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion & reactivity hazards

Flammable Gas & Vapor Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Chemical Reactivity Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify reactive chemical hazards, including the possibility of material incompatibility, instability, and runaway chemical reactions

DIERS Methodology

Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods

Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safety handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature


Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents


Model transport of airborne virus aerosols to guide safe operations and ventilation upgrades


Model transport of contamination for source term and leak path factor analysis

Fire Analysis

Model transport of heat and smoke for fire analysis

Flammable or Toxic Gas

transport of flammable or toxic gas during a process upset

OSS consulting, adiabatic & reaction calorimetry and consulting

Onsite safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical

Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid flow, electric power systems

Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Hydrogen Safety

Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen

Spent Fuel

Safety analysis for packaging, transport, and storage of spent nuclear fuel

Decommissioning, Decontamination and Remediation (DD&R)

Safety analysis to underpin decommissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Bespoke testing and modeling services to validate analysis of DD&R processes

Nuclear Overview

Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant.

Severe Accident Analysis and Risk Assessment

Expert analysis of possible risk and consequences from nuclear plant accidents

Thermal Hydraulics

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Environmental Qualification (EQ) and Equipment Survivability (ES)

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Testing and modeling services to support resolution of emergent safety issues at a power plant

Adiabatic safety calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment (DSC/ARC supplies, CPA, C80, Super Stirrer)

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory


Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions


Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities


Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.


With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

FAI Aerosol Methodology Introduced to Sellafield

Posted by The Fauske Team on 04.18.16

By: Martin G. Plys, DSc., Vice President, Waste Technology and Post-Fukushima Services

Introduction and Purpose

The Sellafield site in Cumbria, UK, contains a number of legacy nuclear fuel cycle operations facilities within a relatively small footprint, including aging facilities with considerable nuclear waste inventory. Prominent among these are the Magnox Swarf Storage Silo (MSSS) and the First Generation Magnox Storage Pond (FGMSP). Fauske & Associates LLC (FAI) is assisting Sellafield Ltd in engineering evaluations for the accelerated removal of materials from these locations, including evaluation of the impact of reactive materials, potential for pyrophoricity, flammable gas hazards and contamination release.

The subject of this technical bulletin is the Sellafield application of the FAI aerosol methodology developed initially for light water reactor (LWR) safety evaluation. The introduction of this FAI methodology to Sellafield Ltd represents significant value added to the customer by transferring a well-known and pedigreed approach to the field of nuclear waste remediation. FAI has recently transferred this technology to MSSS and FGMSP personnel, where it has been used to quantify contamination releases during normal process operations.

The approach described here is broadly applicable to quantify contamination release during operations involving aqueous nuclear waste including wet sludge and other wet waste forms. Of course, the approach can also be applied to quantification of risk for accident scenarios.

Background on Sellafield MSSS and FGMSP

The MSSS facility consists of a number of vertical silo compartments containing a mixture of Magnox cladding in various stages of corrosion whose principle product is magnesium hydroxide, uranium, damaged partially declad Magnox elements and uranium metal carried over with the cladding along with uranium corrosion products, and metallic debris, graphite and cans containing miscellaneous waste forms. The majority of the waste volume is a high yield strength sludge formed from the corrosion products of the Magnox and uranium. A new MSSS sub-programme called the Alternative Intermediate Level Waste Approach (AILWA) is presently evolving the engineering design for an approach for accelerated removal of waste from the silos to an interim storage facility on the Sellafield site. This approach involves retrieving waste into skips containing approximately 1000 L of waste plus cover water, and transferring the skips into containers known as “3m3 boxes” (customer shorthand for 3m3) arranged in a stack array in interim storage vaults.

FGMSP is an outdoor fuel storage pool (pond in the UK parlance) containing a considerable inventory of spent Magnox fuel and corrosion product sludge. The vast majority of the fuel has lost its cladding due to corrosion, and the metallic uranium fuel itself is also in various stages of corrosion. Some fuel is contained in self-draining skips, i.e. skips that would drain as they are removed from the pond, and smaller highly damaged fuel pieces are contained in non-draining “bit bin” skips which would retain their water upon removal from the pond. FGMSP also holds a substantial number of non-draining zeolite skips which were used for removal of pond contamination, mainly cesium and strontium leached during fuel degradation. The accelerated removal option involves removing these kinds of skips from the pond, placing them into self-shielded boxes (SSBs) similar in size to the MSSS 3m3 box but with substantially thicker boundaries for shielding as the name suggests, and arranging the SSB’s in a stack array in interim storage vaults.

The MSSS and non-draining FGMSP skips share a common mechanism for the release of contamination, aerosol formation by the bursting of hydrogen bubbles at the cover water surface. This is a commonly encountered situation for aqueous nuclear wastes, where the hydrogen can be produced either by chemical reactions, by radiolysis, or both mechanisms. The MSSS 3m3 boxes and the FGMSP SSBs holding the waste skips will have filters to allow release of the hydrogen, pressure equilibrium during interim storage, and high-efficiency particulate (HEPA) attenuation of contamination release.

The FAI aerosol methodology will be explained first below, followed by a description of generic example application to MSSS and FGMSP contamination release and transport behavior during interim storage.

FAI Aerosol Methodology

The FAI aerosol methodology was developed for the Industry Degraded Core Rulemaking Forum (IDCOR) program in the late 1980s in order to predict the behavior of fission product aerosols during LWR severe accidents. The methodology is based upon exact solutions to the integro-differential equation for the evolution of the particle size distribution (PSD) of aerosols. Details are found in (Epstein, Ellison, and Henry, 1986) and (Epstein and Ellison, 1988). The methodology is also described in an American Nuclear Society publication, (Sher and Hobbins, 2011).

The foundation of the methodology is the application of a mass balance on the total aerosol mass M suspended in a well-mixed volume,


In the mass balance, S is the aerosol source (kg/s), λS is the decay constant for aerosol settling (also called sedimentation), and λL is the decay constant for aerosol removal (leakage) by outflow from the volume. Other terms for aerosol removal by processes such as water vapor condensation and inertial impaction can be added to the mass balance as well. For a polydisperse aerosol (an aerosol with a PSD), the settling decay constant is given by a curve fit to the suspended mass. The suspended mass is given by exact solutions for the PSD as mentioned above. Also, given the suspended mass, the aerosol PSD can also be found. The correlations are universal because they are based upon scaling that considers factors such as the particle density, the viscosity and temperature of the gas in which the aerosol is suspended, the height for aerosol settling, coagulation efficiency factors and shape factors to account for asphericity of particles.

Thus, the FAI aerosol methodology considerably simplifies the evaluation of source terms and leak path factors for practical applications to LWR safety, safety during decontamination and decommissioning (D&D), nuclear waste processing and interim storage of nuclear waste. The methodology is also generally applicable to commercial chemical processes and installations.

An example of validation of the methodology is shown in Figure 1. This figure shows the experimental data obtained by (Hilliard, McCormack, and Postma, 1983) for a sodium fire aerosol in a large vertical tank whose volume was about 850 m3. Also indicated are the exact solution using the FAI sectional aerosol model and the FAI aerosol correlation.

Simplification for Monodisperse and Lean Aerosols

For a monodisperse aerosol (single average particle size) or for a lean polydisperse aerosol in which particle coagulation may be neglected, the gravitational sedimentation constant λS is the deposition velocity us divided by the average settling height hu


The sedimentation velocity is given by Stokes’ law


where g = 9.81 m/s2 p is the particle density (kg/m3), d is the particle size (m), and μair is the viscosity of air, about 1.85x10-5 Pa-s (the gas viscosity will be essentially that of air despite small amounts of hydrogen and water vapor).

The leakage removal rate constant λL is the fractional volume of gas removed per unit time


where QL is the volumetric rate of gas flow (m3/s) leaving the volume V (m3) in which the aerosols reside.

It is particularly of interest to note that in a steady state, which is of common interest for transport or interim storage of nuclear waste, the suspended mass is given by


so that the rate of leakage WL (kg/s) is given by


Suppose the leakage occurs through a filter whose decontamination factor DF is known. The DF is the ratio of the aerosol emitted by the filter divided by the aerosol entering the filter. Then the source term of aerosols Wrel (kg/s) released from the filtered volume is


where the decontamination factor due to sedimentation within the volume is


The key point is that crediting aerosol sedimentation can substantially reduce the predicted source term, because the DF for sedimentation can be comparable to the DF for the filter.


FAI Hygroscopic Aerosol Methodology

A droplet of pure liquid water can only grow in air when the relative humidity exceeds 100%, and an existing drop of pure liquid water will quickly evaporate as the relative humidity is decreased from above 100%. However, when hygroscopic impurities exist in an aerosol droplet created somehow from an aqueous waste, or when there is suspended hygroscopic particulate, an aerosol droplet can exist when the relative humidity is less than 100%, which is the common application for a waste container, both internally and externally. The droplet will shrink or grow to an equilibrium size that depends upon the concentration of the hygroscopic solute and the ambient relative humidity.

The equilibrium particle size for a hygroscopic particle is noted in numerous textbook references, among them (Mason, 1971) as cited by (Sher and Hobbins, 2011) and as also fundamentally derived in (Jokiniemi, 1983) and (Fauske & Associates, 1985). The cited references provide the dynamic equation for particle growth, and it can be seen that the time scale to achieve equilibrium is on the order of ten to several hundred seconds, depending on the conditions. This time scale is so small compared to the time scale for sedimentation and breathing that for all practical purposes the equilibrium particle size is valid. The equilibrium particle diameter is given by


where Φ = Relative humidity, Q=factor to account for ionic charges = 2 for NaOH, KOH, CsOH, ω=molecular weight (kg/mole), ρ=density (kg/m3), d=diameter (m), σ=surface tension (N/m), R=ideal gas constant (Pa- m3/mole-K), T=temperature (K), and the subscripts are “a”=aerosol meaning the original hygroscopic material, “w”=water, and “0”=seed based on pure hygroscopic solid material. The particle seed diameter d0 is given by the ppm of the impurities and the birth size of the droplet, which determines the mass and therefore the volume of the impurities in a droplet.

The FAI hygroscopic aerosol methodology for a lean aerosol uses the equation above to determine the equilibrium particle size, which is then used in Stokes’ law to yield the settling velocity and ultimately the settling decay constant. An example of the particle sizes that are obtained for various amounts of dissolved NaOH in a suspended aqueous waste droplet whose initial diameter is 3.2 micron is shown in Figure 2. For very low relative humidity, below 10%, the particle approaches its “seed diameter” and has very little water. For relative humidity approaching 100%, the particle size can approach the “birth diameter” that was assumed here, for the explored range of NaOH initial mass concentration.

For aqueous nuclear waste applications, the dissolved amount of radioactive substances such as 137Cs and 90Sr may be low, so it is important to consider the presence of all other dissolved impurities as shown in the example.

Application to Waste Skip Source Term Quantification

An example geometry for application of the FAI aerosol methodology to interim storage of nuclear waste is shown in Figure 3. In this example, the skip has a lid and a filter. Other arrangements of skips and their container boxes are illustrated in Figure 4.

Hydrogen gas is produced within the waste and continuously released, and aerosols are produced by the bursting of the bubbles at the cover water surface. The mass (or volume) rate of aerosol generation is directly proportional to the mass (or volume) rate of gas release when the bubbly flow regime pertains, see (Ginsberg, 1985) and (Garner et al, 1954). Also, the drop size spectrum has very few measurable particles of size less than 1 micron and greater than 10 microns in diameter. The geometric mean of this range, about 3.2 microns, is a conservative diameter to use for a source droplet because it is smaller than the volume average that would be obtained by assuming a uniform droplet PSD over the range.

For MSSS and FGMSP, FAI created detailed thermal and chemical reaction models for the waste during interim storage, and this modeling provided the technical basis for the waste and headspace temperatures, gas generation rates, breathing rates and relative humidities that are needed to apply the FAI aerosol methodology.

The aerosol source rate from bubble burst is found using the entrainment coefficient from the references cited above. By considering the hydrogen source rate and barometric breathing that can occur during interim storage, the leakage decay constant may be obtained using the equations described here above. The equilibrium suspended particle size is found by the method for hygroscopic particle size above, given the relative humidity of the skip headspace, so the settling decay constant may be obtained using the equations described here above. This allows the decontamination factor by settling DFS to be quantified and with it the source term Wrel.

For the other geometry types shown in Figure 4, aerosol settling may also occur in the box outside the skip when there is a series arrangement of volumes. In this case, the source term from the skip to the box is the source of aerosols in the box, and the relative humidity, particle size, breathing rate and decay constants for leakage and settling will be different for the box than for the skip.

Application to interim storage vault contamination and release to environment

Outside the box within the interim storage vault, the same principles used above can be applied, see Figure 5. Aerosols released from a waste box can settle on the box top or leak into a well-mixed space between box stacks. Settling on the box top can be quantified by considering the volume between two vertically stacked boxes to be a well-mixed control volume. The volume and air flow rate within this horizontal gap define the leakage decay constant. The appropriate particle size is used to determine the settling velocity, and the gap thickness is the settling height, allowing the settling decay constant to be determined.

In the vault above the stack of waste boxes, aerosols released from within the box stack may be considered well-mixed so that the aerosol balance method can be applied to the vault as a whole. The vault volume and ventilation rate determine the leakage decay constant, and the appropriate particle size and settling height determine the settling decay constant.

The FAI aerosol methodology described here has been used at Sellafield Ltd to quantify contamination release during normal interim storage operations for wastes originating from MSSS and FGMSP, including the quantification of locally deposited and airborne contamination used to determine the contamination classification level of the facility, and to quantify emissions to the environment.

The same methodology can be generally applied for aqueous and wet sludge/saltcake types of nuclear waste process operations and interim storage for normal and accident scenarios.

The Sellafield Ltd customer has benefited from the transfer of this technology originally developed by FAI for LWR safety applications, and now used for nuclear waste remediation.

Re f erence s
Epstein, M., P.G. Ellison, and R.E. Henry, Correlation of Aerosol Sedimentation, Journal of Colloidal and
     Inter face Science, Vol. 113, No. 2, pp. 342-355, 1986.
Epstein, M., and P.G. Ellison, Correlations of the Rate of Removal of Coagulating and Depositing Aerosols for
     Application to Nuclear Reactor Safety Problems, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 107, pp. 327-
 344, 1988.
Fauske & Associates, Inc., Technical Support for Issue Resolution, FAI/85-27, submitted to the Industry for
     Degraded Core Rulemaking Program, July, 1985.
Garner, F.H., S. R. M. Ellis, and J. A. Lacey, “The Size Distribution and Entrainment of Droplets,” Trans. Instit.
     Chem. Engrs. 32, pp. 222-229 (1954).
Ginsberg, T., Aerosol Generation by Liquid Breakup Resulting from Sparging of Molten Pools of Corium by
     Gases Released During Core/Concrete Interactions, Nuclear Science and Engineering Vol. 89, pp. 36-
     48, 1985.
Hilliard, R.K., J.D. McCormack, and A.K . Postma, Results and Code Predictions for ABCOVE Aerosol Code
     Validation – AB5, HEDL-TME 83-16, Hanford Engineering and Development Laboratory, Richland, WA,
Jokiniemi, J., The Growth of Hygroscopic Par ticles during Severe Core Melt Accidents, Nuclear Technology Vol.
     83, October 1988, pp. 16-23.
Mason, B.J., The Physics of Clouds, Clarendon Press, 1971.
Sher, R., and Hobbins, R., Transport and Removal of Aerosols in Nuclear Power Plants Following Severe
     Accidents, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, USA, 2011.


Figure 1: Comparison of the FAI aerosol correlation to AB-5 experimental data


Figure 2: Hygroscopic aerosol particle size as function of relative humidity for various
NaOH mass concentrations in a particle with initial diameter 3.2 microns.


Figure 3: Aerosol behavior in a waste skip headspace

20160329-1MGP_-_fig_4.png         20160329-2MGP_-_fig_5.png

Figure 4: Aerosol behavior for various skip and box configurations   Figure 5: Aerosol behavior in an interim storage vault

For more information or to discuss, please contact Dr. Martin G. Plys, (630) 887-5207,


Subscribe to FAI's "Nuclear Technical Bulletins"

Subscribe to FAI's Quarterly "Process Safety News"


#nuclear risk #nuclear accident #aerosol modeling


Topics: nuclear accident, aerosol modeling, nuclear waste, nuclear risk, aerosol methodology


Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now