Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion & reactivity hazards

Flammable Gas & Vapor Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Chemical Reactivity Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify reactive chemical hazards, including the possibility of material incompatibility, instability, and runaway chemical reactions

DIERS Methodology

Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods

Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safety handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature

UN-DOT

Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents

Biological

Model transport of airborne virus aerosols to guide safe operations and ventilation upgrades

Radioactive

Model transport of contamination for source term and leak path factor analysis

Fire Analysis

Model transport of heat and smoke for fire analysis

Flammable or Toxic Gas

transport of flammable or toxic gas during a process upset

OSS consulting, adiabatic & reaction calorimetry and consulting

Onsite safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical

Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid flow, electric power systems

Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Hydrogen Safety

Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen

Spent Fuel

Safety analysis for packaging, transport, and storage of spent nuclear fuel

Decommissioning, Decontamination and Remediation (DD&R)

Safety analysis to underpin decommissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Bespoke testing and modeling services to validate analysis of DD&R processes

Nuclear Overview

Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant.

Severe Accident Analysis and Risk Assessment

Expert analysis of possible risk and consequences from nuclear plant accidents

Thermal Hydraulics

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Environmental Qualification (EQ) and Equipment Survivability (ES)

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Testing and modeling services to support resolution of emergent safety issues at a power plant

Adiabatic safety calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment (DSC/ARC supplies, CPA, C80, Super Stirrer)

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory

FERST

Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions

FATE

Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities

Blog

Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.

Resources

With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

Recommendations on the Maximum Operating Pressure of ARC Test Cells

Posted by Ken Kurko on 02.19.19

by Ken Kurko, Chief Technology Officer, Fauske & Associates, LLC

_69

Ken Kurko
Chief Technology Officer
Fauske & Associates, LLC

At Fauske & Associates, LLC (FAI), we are commonly asked about the burst pressures of the Accelerating Rate Calorimeter (ARC) test cells that we offer. The ARC is a high thermal inertia adiabatic calorimeter that is used to obtain runaway chemical reaction data and thermal stability properties.As a runaway reaction occurs in this apparatus, the pressure within the test cell naturally rises whether it be due to vapor pressure effects, the generation of non-condensable gas, or both. The pressure generated by the runaway reaction must be contained by the test cell. As a result of this requirement, the mass of the test cell is relatively large compared to the mass of test sample used. This means that as a runaway reaction progresses, heat from the reaction is absorbed by the test cell and the data are not directly applicable to the process scale.

The standard ARC test cell is approximately 10 ml in volume and is typically constructed of stainless steel, Hastelloy C, titanium, or tantalum. This size of test cell has an internal diameter of 1.0 inches. The wall thicknesses of test cells can be 0.020, 0.025, or 0.035 inches. A diagram of a test cell is provided in Figure 1.

Arc Test Cell Thermal Stability
Figure 1 Standard 10 ml
ARC Test Cell

The reasoning behind the desire to know the burst pressure is so that as much sample material can be added to the test cell as possible without causing a rupture during the test. This reduces the thermal inertia (or essentially, the amount of heat absorbed by the test cell) and ensures lower energy exothermic activity isn’t masked. However, regardless of how much sample is loaded to a test cell, the resulting thermal inertia will never be representative of the process scale (1.05 - 1.10).

The ARC isn’t, and never was, intended to be a low thermal inertia calorimeter. The data from this apparatus will require correction for the thermal inertia. If low thermal inertia data are desired, a calorimeter intended for operation at low thermal inertias Vent Sizing Package 2 (VSP2TM) or Advanced Reactive System Screening Tool  (ARSSTTM) should be used.

Furthermore, this issue isn’t as simple as telling an ARC user the burst pressure of a particular test cell. When designing a test, one must balance a number of variables to ensure optimal results: the sample mass, the maximum temperature that could be achieved during the test, the maximum pressure that could be achieved during the test, the maximum self-heat rate under which adiabatic conditions are maintained, and material compatibility between the test cell and sample.

In order to address the original question regarding test cell burst pressure, we’ll focus on how the ultimate tensile strength of a given test cell material and the wall thickness are related to the peak temperature and peak pressure resulting during a test. The ultimate tensile strength decreases with increasing temperature. Figure 2 illustrates the effect of temperature on the ultimate tensile strengths of common test cell materials. Based on those tensile strengths, the theoretical burst pressures can be calculated for spheres with the specified dimensions provided in Table 1 using Equation 1 below.

σt Untitled-1-22

where
σt = ultimate tensile strength (Pa)

tw = wall thickness of spherical portion of test cell (m)

r = inner radius of test cell (m)

P = internal gauge pressure (Pa)

 

Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature for ARC Test Cell Materials
Figure 2 Ultimate Tensile Strength as a Function of Temperature for ARC Test Cell Materials

 

These are, of course, “ideal” calculations for a sphere that don’t account for the actual geometry of the test cell, nor imperfections that invariably occur during the manufacturing process. For example, the presence of a weld seam and the inhomogeneous microstructures within the welded metal leads to higher corrosion rates when compared to wrought products. Types of factors such as this need to be taken into account. For this reason, the theoretical burst pressures should not be used for test design - a safety factor of 2 to 3 should be used. Table 1 summarizes the theoretical burst pressures and our recommended maximum operating pressures for the various ARC test cells we offer.

Table 1 Theoretical Burst Pressure and Recommended Maximum Operating Pressure as a Function of Maximum Test Temperature for Standard ARC Test Cells
Theoretical Burst Pressure thermal stability

 

If you enjoyed learning about ARC and its purpose, check out our case study on low thermal inertia adiabatic calorimetry.  In this case study, FAI performs tests to determine what is the self accelerating decomposition temperature of a 50 kg package of azodicarbonamide. Download the case study now to to learn more about AKTS software, self accelerating decomposition temperature, the United States SADT test, and much more.

Download Now

 

References


Haynes International, “Hastelloy C-276 Alloy Tensile Strength and Elongation.” Retrieved September 5, 2018
from http://haynesintl.com/alloys/alloy-portfolio_/Corrosion-resistant-Alloys/HASTELLOY -C-276-Alloy/tensile-strength-and-elongation

North American Stainless, “Flat Product Stainless Steel Grade Sheet 316 - 316L.” Retrieved September 5, 2018
from https://www.northameric anstainless.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Grade-316-316L.pdf

Kobelco, Kobe Steel Group, “Highest Specific Strength of Existing Metallic Materials - Characteristic s.” Retrieved September 5, 2018
from http://www.kobelco.co.jp/english/titan/files/details.pdf

Pick PM , Metal Powder Industries Federation, “What Are Refractory Metals?” Retrieved September 24, 2018
from https://www.pick pm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/What-Are-Refractory-Metals.pdf

Davis, J.R., ASM Specialty Handbook - Heat-Resistant Materials - Part I. Introduction. ASM International.(1997). Retrieved September 5, 2018
from https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt00URR 0YB /asm-speci alty-handbook/part-i-introduction

Topics: calorimetry, arc test

cta-bg.jpg

Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now