Hazards Analysis, Code Compliance & Procedure Development

Services to identify process safety hazards and facilitate compliance with established standards and codes.

Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion and reactivity hazards

Flammable Gas & Vapor Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Chemical Reactivity Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify reactive chemical hazards, including the possibility of material incompatibility, instability, and runaway chemical reactions

DIERS Methodology

Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods

Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safety handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature


Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents


Model transport of airborne virus aerosols to guide safe operations and ventilation upgrades


Model transport of contamination for source term and leak path factor analysis

Fire Analysis

Model transport of heat and smoke for fire analysis

Flammable or Toxic Gas

transport of flammable or toxic gas during a process upset

OSS consulting, adiabatic & reaction calorimetry and consulting

Onsite safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical

Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid flow, electric power systems

Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Hydrogen Safety

Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen

Spent Fuel

Safety analysis for packaging, transport, and storage of spent nuclear fuel

Decommissioning, Decontamination and Remediation (DD&R)

Safety analysis to underpin decommissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Bespoke testing and modeling services to validate analysis of DD&R processes

Nuclear Overview

Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant.

Severe Accident Analysis and Risk Assessment

Expert analysis of possible risk and consequences from nuclear plant accidents

Thermal Hydraulics

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Environmental Qualification (EQ) and Equipment Survivability (ES)

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Testing and modeling services to support resolution of emergent safety issues at a power plant

Adiabatic Safety Calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment and Parts for the DSC/ARC/ARSST/VSP2 Calorimeters

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory


Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions


Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities


Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.


With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

Analysis for Battery LIfe Extension Under ELAP Conditions

Posted by The Fauske Team on 07.14.15

By Brenda Lorenz, Manager, Components & IT Systems, Fauske & Associates, LLC

A station (SBO) is defined as the all AC power at a nuclear plant, This is a loss of off-site together with a failure of the emergency backup to operate. Per NRC Regulations Title 1 0, Code Of Federal Regulations (CFR) 5063 Of all alternating current all US. plants a coping capability for SW conditions for a limited time period rarging from approximately tv.•o to sixteen hours. An extended of AC power event is as a loss of all off-site and on-site AC sources for an indetemnate period Of time. which will Challenge the kM1g-term Cooling Of the the Spent fuel (SFP) unless mitigating actions are taken. I his extended requirement is the result of the events at Fukushima.

Station batteries provide control to switchgear breakers needed for the operation of the AC equipment including the independent core cooling sources. The batteries also provide necessary control power for indication of vital plant parameters. DC power in some designs is the motive power for DC independent injection. Outside of the required independent offsite power supplies there are dedicated SBO diesel generators or gas turbines. Prior to recovery from an ELAP it is imperative that DC power remain available for indication and for control once AC power is restored.

For ELAP event, there is no design basis accident assumed. Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Diverse And Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide (NEI 12-06, Aug. 2012) requires the 125 VDC class 1E batteries to last for at least 24 hours. Approaches to meet this requirement include:

  • Load-shedding procedures,
  • Cross-tying batteries between divisions, and 
  • Delayed battery operation

An example of a station DC battery system that will be used for this analysis is shown in Figure 1. This figure shows the 125V DC bus, battery and battery charger. The loads were distributed between two feeder panels.

DC Battery Schematic

The battery in this example was sized for a four hour profile. Typically, it is assumed that the diesel generator would be available in this time frame. In the four hour timeframe, the bus voltage reaches 118.9 V. With a cell voltage of 1.97 volts per cell (VPC), this shows there is margin when assuming 1.75 VPC as the minimum cell voltage. Figure 2 shows a plot of Time (min) versus Discharge Voltage (V).


Baseline Load Profile Discharge Voltag Plot


The same battery was then analyzed for an ELAP duration of eight hours with load shedding. It was assumed that load shedding was not implemented until one hour into the event. Figure 3 shows the bus voltage at eight hours is 114.12V which equates to 1.90 VPC indicating margin is still available.


Extended Load Profile Discharge Voltage Plot


Also in Figure 3, at 60 minutes the plot shows a slight dip indicating change in the load profile. A second dip on the plot at 120 minutes (for duration of one minute) indicates an attempted start of the diesel generators.

A third run was then made to determine the time to the minimum bus voltage of 105 V (1.75 VPC); this was reached in 11 hours. To extend beyond 11 hours, the system was operated with one division battery tripped at the time of load shedding and then reconnected when the operating voltage of the functioning 125 VDC system reached 105 VDC. This then allowed DC power to be available for close to 24 hours. Given this is an ELAP and accident only one division of the DC is reserved. This type of operation can be completed by operating the redundant equipment on the delayed system or by a manual crosstie between divisions to allow for continued operation of the same equipment.

In some cases analyzed, the bus voltage was allowed to drop below 105 VDC. This was based on the dropout voltage being lower then pickup voltage. Also, this extension beyond the minimum volts per cell was substantiated by calculating the actual mole fraction of acid remaining in the battery.

Results of battery coping analyses carry conservatisms. For example, it is assumed that the inverter loads are all constant power meaning that as the voltage decays with time, the current increases. Most inverter loads are constant impedance.

Another assumption was that all load shedding occurs at a given time. In reality, once the decision is reached to shed load the process usually extends over a period of time with gradual load decay as opposed to a single shedding of load. For example, the process may start at 0.5 hours and be completed at 1.5 hours. The example above assumed full battery load up until the time of load shed.

These analyses are important in the sense that they help identify the time where recovery of AC becomes critical.


Download as a PDF



#battery life, ELAP, #station blackout, #nuclear power, #power plant, #nuclear plant, #station battery, #extended loss of AC power, #spent fuel, #fukushima, #DC power, #load shed

Subscribe to FAI's "Nuclear Technical Bulletins"



Topics: nuclear plant, nuclear safety, nuclear power


Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now