Hazards Analysis, Code Compliance & Procedure Development

Services to identify process safety hazards and facilitate compliance with established standards and codes.

Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion and reactivity hazards

Flammable Gas & Vapor Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Chemical Reactivity Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify reactive chemical hazards, including the possibility of material incompatibility, instability, and runaway chemical reactions

ISO Accreditation and Scope
Fauske & Associates fulfills the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 in the field of Testing
DIERS Methodology

Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods

Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safety handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature


Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents


Model transport of airborne virus aerosols to guide safe operations and ventilation upgrades


Model transport of contamination for source term and leak path factor analysis

Fire Analysis

Model transport of heat and smoke for fire analysis

Flammable or Toxic Gas

transport of flammable or toxic gas during a process upset

OSS consulting, adiabatic & reaction calorimetry and consulting

Onsite safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical

Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid flow, electric power systems

Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Hydrogen Safety

Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen

Spent Fuel

Safety analysis for packaging, transport, and storage of spent nuclear fuel

Decommissioning, Decontamination and Remediation (DD&R)

Safety analysis to underpin decommissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Bespoke testing and modeling services to validate analysis of DD&R processes

Nuclear Overview

Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant.

Severe Accident Analysis and Risk Assessment

Expert analysis of possible risk and consequences from nuclear plant accidents

Thermal Hydraulics

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Environmental Qualification (EQ) and Equipment Survivability (ES)

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Testing and modeling services to support resolution of emergent safety issues at a power plant

Adiabatic Safety Calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment and Parts for the DSC/ARC/ARSST/VSP2 Calorimeters

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory


Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions


Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities


Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.


With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

Further Clarification of Non-Equilibrium and Equilibrium Flashing Flows

Posted by Marc Cramer on 02.24.20

By Hans K. Fauske, D.Sc., Emeritus President and Regent Advisor, Fauske & Associates, LLC

For chemically reactive systems most emergency releases involve two phase flow. Non-equilibrium conditions are generally required in order to relate the mass flux for flashing flows to local exit conditions. Upstream of the exit region, the flashing process will approach equilibrium conditions if the vent duct is of sufficient length. For flow lengths less than about 100 mm (the non-equilibrium regime) the flashing flow increases strongly with decreasing length, approaching all liquid flow as the length approaches zero (orifice flow).


Non-Equilibrium Flashing Flow

If all liquid exists at stagnation conditions (no vapor), extensive data suggest that a simple length criterion on the order of 100 mm characterizes the residence time (~ 1 ms) requirement for approaching equilibrium flashing flows, which are well described by the Equilibrium Rate Model (ERM) (Fauske, 1985):


where λ is the latent heat of evaporation, vfg is the change in liquid-vapor specific volume, T is the temperature, and C is the liquid specific heat, all evaluated at stagnation conditions. In contrast, the maximum non-equilibrium mass flux as the flow path length approaches zero is given by


where P is the stagnation gauge pressure and ρ is the liquid stagnation density. Considering that


determines the relevant velocity and the length requirement of about 100 mm for all liquid stagnation conditions (near saturated liquid and subcooled liquid).


Equilibrium Flashing Flow

If liquid-vapor (void fraction α > 0.1) exists at stagnation conditions, the length L (mm) required to satisfy a residence time of about 1 ms is given by


and in the case α < 0.1 at stagnation condition, the length increases to L(0.1/α) resulting in length requirements different than 100 mm. In other words the 100 mm length requirement is only relevant to all liquid stagnation conditions.


Length Requirement of 100 mm

It is of interest to note that the simple length criterion of about 100 mm is based on data reflecting a large variation in stagnation pressure from about 2 bara to about 68 bara. Considering Eq. (2) this represents a large variation in the velocity from about 14.6 m s-1 to 134 m s-1. This raises the question, why is there a relatively constant length criterion of about 100 mm, even for high pressure discharge with associated high velocity?

100mm cylinder

Recalling that in the absence of any vapor at stagnation conditions (xo = 0) the reference to residence time is related to nucleation (the formation of sites where vapor bubbles can grow). This is in contrast to stagnation conditions with vapor (xo > 0) where the residence time relates to vaporization, and where nucleation sites (vapor) already exist.

Note that at 68 bara the superheat relative to atmospheric pressure is 185°C while at 2 bara it is only 20°C, suggesting a ratio of 9.25. It is interesting to observe that this superheat ratio compares closely to the ratio of velocities, 134/14.6 = 9.18.

The relatively constant length criterion of 100 mm is not sensitive to the variation in stagnation pressure (and associated variation in velocity), as a result of the variation in superheat having an equivalent effect on the residence time related to nucleation.

Fauske was named one of the top 10 chemical engineering blogs on the web! Subscribe below and stay up to date on the latest in relief system design, combustible dust, and much more.

Subscribe Now



Hans K. Fauske, 1985, "Flashing Flows Or: Some Practical Guidelines for Emergency Releases," Plant/Operations Progress (July, 1985).

Topics: emergency relief system design, chemical


Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now