Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion & reactivity hazards

Flammable Gas & Vapor Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Chemical Reactivity Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify reactive chemical hazards, including the possibility of material incompatibility, instability, and runaway chemical reactions

DIERS Methodology

Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods

Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safety handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature

UN-DOT

Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents

Biological

Model transport of airborne virus aerosols to guide safe operations and ventilation upgrades

Radioactive

Model transport of contamination for source term and leak path factor analysis

Fire Analysis

Model transport of heat and smoke for fire analysis

Flammable or Toxic Gas

transport of flammable or toxic gas during a process upset

OSS consulting, adiabatic & reaction calorimetry and consulting

Onsite safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical

Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid flow, electric power systems

Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Hydrogen Safety

Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen

Spent Fuel

Safety analysis for packaging, transport, and storage of spent nuclear fuel

Decommissioning, Decontamination and Remediation (DD&R)

Safety analysis to underpin decommissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Bespoke testing and modeling services to validate analysis of DD&R processes

Nuclear Overview

Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant.

Severe Accident Analysis and Risk Assessment

Expert analysis of possible risk and consequences from nuclear plant accidents

Thermal Hydraulics

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Environmental Qualification (EQ) and Equipment Survivability (ES)

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Testing and modeling services to support resolution of emergent safety issues at a power plant

Adiabatic safety calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment (DSC/ARC supplies, CPA, C80, Super Stirrer)

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory

FERST

Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions

FATE

Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities

Blog

Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.

Resources

With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

MIE Testing for Combustible Dust Safety: With or Without Inductance?

Posted by The Fauske Team on 10.30.20

By the Combustible Dust Safety Team, Fauske & Associates, LLC

 

We know we have discussed the Minimum Ignition Energy (MIE) test before, but given a recent uptick in questions on the subject, we thought it was a good time to “dust” off the topic and take another look.



MIE graphicThe MIE test determines the lowest amount of spark energy that is required to initiate an explosion of a dust in a suspended cloud. It is performed using ASTM E2019, “Standard Test Method for Minimum Ignition Energy of a Dust Cloud in Air” or EN13821 “Potentially explosive atmospheres — Explosion prevention and protection — Determination of minimum ignition energy of dust/air mixtures”.  These methods provide procedures for performing laboratory tests to determine the minimum ignition energy of a dust cloud.

In both standards, the MIE tests can be performed with or without “inductance” - which Merriam-Webster.com defines as: “A property of an electric circuit by which an electromotive force is induced in it by a variation of current either in the circuit itself or in a neighboring circuit”. So, what does that really mean?  Simply put, testing “WITH inductance” simulates the longer duration discharges from electronic circuitry that can occur from machines or control equipment (essentially a spark from short in a wire or electronic equipment) or mechanical sparks.  Testing with inductance is a more conservative approach that ensures you have the lowest MIE value possible for your material.

Testing WITHOUT inductance better simulates discharges from “pure” and “ideal” static electric sources (the build-up of a charge on a surface resulting from contact with other surfaces – e.g. pouring or rubbing). The spark duration is shorter when dealing with “pure” static electric sources, so the determined energy levels are typically less conservative.

This data is critical when considering what could happen if a dust cloud is exposed to a spark.  A build up of static electricity is a fairly common occurrence in many industrial processes.  Simple movements or activities such as conveying, sieving or pouring/transferring material from container to container can be enough to cause a spark, and, that could be all it takes – one spark from a short in a wire or a discharge from a “pure” static electric source, plus the right air to dust (read fuel) mixture,  to cause ignition. 

Knowledge of the MIE of a dust is also helpful in housekeeping situation as it can help facilities identify proper tools for safe clean up, as well as assist in the safer design of dust collection equipment. Additionally, knowledge about the MIE level is important for establishing proper grounding and bonding protocols and designing ignition source avoidance methodologies.

MIE

Of course, the data provided by MIE testing can be even more useful when combined with a dust hazard analysis or DHA which is a systematic evaluation of the hazards involved in the dust handling or generating process. Either way it is critical to take a look at your own facility and process to determine the best iteration of the test for your specific scenario needs.

After a review of your facility, if you are certain of the type of equipment being used in your process, or are confident that you are only dealing with electrostatic sparks, then you can determine if the MIE should be conducted with or without inductance. If, you are only concerned about static-electric sparks, then likely the MIE test without inductance should be performed. If, however, you are worried about sparks from electronic circuitry, other ignition sources or you wish to publish the MIE value on a Safety Data Sheet, then the more conservative MIE method using inductance in the circuit is more appropriate.

This is intended to inform about the differences between MIE testing with and without inductance. If there is any question about which form of the test should be used, you should consult a dust expert for guidance or use the conservative approach.

For more information, please contact us at dust@fauske.com.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PROCESS SAFETY NEWS

Topics: Combustible dust, Minimum ignition temperature test, combustible hazard, comdust, process safety, process hazards analysis, process hazards, MIE test, PHA, dust cloud, inductance, SDS, safety data sheet, testing

cta-bg.jpg

Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now