Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion and reactivity hazards

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents

Gas and Vapor

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations
Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen
Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature

Adiabatic Calorimetry
Data demonstrate the consequences of process upsets, such as failed equipment or improper procedures, and guide mitigation strategies including Emergency Relief System (ERS) design
Reaction Calorimetry
Data yield heat and gas removal requirements to control the desired process chemistry
Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents

Cable Testing
Evaluate electrical cables to demonstrate reliability and identify defects or degradation
Equipment Qualification (EQ)
Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions
Water Hammer
Analysis and testing to identify and prevent unwanted hydraulic pressure transients in process piping
Acoustic Vibration
Identify and eliminate potential sources of unwanted vibration in piping and structural systems
Gas & Air Intrusion
Analysis and testing to identify and prevent intrusion of gas or air in piping systems
ISO/IEC 17025:2017

Fauske & Associates fulfills the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 in the field of Testing

ISO 9001:2015
Fauske & Associates fulfills the requirements of ISO 9001:2015
Dust Hazards Analysis
Evaluate your process to identify combustible dust hazards and perform dust explosion testing
On-Site Risk Management
On-site safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up
DIERS Methodology
Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods
Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safely handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

FATE™ & Facility Modeling

FATE (Facility Flow, Aerosol, Thermal, and Explosion) is a flexible, fast-running code developed and maintained by Fauske and Associates under an ASME NQA-1 compliant QA program.

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical
Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid, flow, and electric power systems
Hydrogen Safety
Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen
Thermal Hydraulics
Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions
Nuclear Safety
Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant
Radioactive Waste
Safety analysis to underpin decomissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials
Adiabatic Safety Calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment and Parts for the DSC/ARC/ARSST/VSP2 Calorimeters

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory


Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions


Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities


Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.


With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

Why Consider Closed Cell ARSST Operation?

Posted by Fauske & Associates on 08.20.19

James Burelbach, PhD, Process Safety & Business Development Leader, Fauske & Associates, LLC

The Advanced Reactive System Screening ToolTM (ARSST) is a popular low thermal-inertia safety calorimeter. It is commonly used to quickly obtain directly scalable data on chemical reactivity hazards and thermally unstable substances.  The ARSST provides reliable adiabatic data which can be used for a variety of safety applications including emergency relief system design DIERS vent sizing, studies of material compatibility or thermal stability, and sometimes just to better understand the unintended (or intended) reaction chemistry.  ARSST data include adiabatic rates of temperature and pressure rise (dT/dt and dP/dt) during a runaway chemical reaction which can be directly applied during process scale-up to size pressure relief vents and quench or knockout tanks and to underpin other aspects of process safety management. Developed by Fauske & Associates, LLC (FAI) the ARSST has options for customization such as a high-pressure vessel and flow regime detector.

The ARSST is based on DIERS technology which is recognized by OSHA as an example of good engineering practice. This easy-to-use device is an excellent tool for industry as well as any university engineering lab for research or unit operation studies (a SACHE module was developed for ARSST education).

ARSST tests are routinely used to model such diverse upset scenarios as loss of cooling, loss of stirring, mischarge of reagents, mass-loaded upset, batch contamination and fire exposure heating.  

Such low thermal inertia adiabatic calorimetry data are essential for mitigation of chemical reactivity hazards.

The ARSST typically uses a relatively small yet representative sample size of 5-10 grams in a lightweight glass test cell with a volume of approximately 10 ml.  Test cell volumes of 5 ml or 20 ml are sometimes used. The test cell is outfitted with a belt heater and then installed in a 350 ml (or 450 ml) pressure containment vessel.  ARSST tests are typically run using open test cell methodology.  In the open test configuration, the test cell is open to the containment vessel and boiling of the test sample is prevented by imposing an inert gas backpressure within the containment vessel.


But when does it make sense to Use the ARSST for Closed Cell Testing?

We are sometimes asked this question by customers who wish to get the most out of their ARSST apparatus.  Closed cell testing is an ARSST innovation that has been available for several years, although it is not as commonly used as open cell testing. Some reasons to consider closed cell ARSST testing are:

  • Directly scalable data are still possible if using thin wall glass
  • Heavier test cells (ARC bombs or thick wall glass) can be used for thermal hazards screening
  • Direct measurement of sample temperature in solids or liquids
  • Magnetically stirring is still good
  • Can directly measure vapor pressure of the reacting system
  • Can utilize manual pressure balancing (to a point).  Initially imposed external pressure can make active pressure balancing unnecessary even for a thin wall test cell.
  • Better resolution of pressure for mild reactions (though not desirable for gas-generating systems)
  • Onset detection for gas generating materials (pressure sensitivity is often better than temperature sensitivity)
  • Use either low or high thermal inertia test cells (low or high phi factor)
  • We recommend dedicated 450 ml containment vessel configured for closed cell operation

Below are some illustrations and examples from work we have done using the closed cell ARSST.  We hope this information is of interest to ARSST users who look for innovative ways to get the most use out of their ARSST.

20 ml              10 ml             5 ml

Long Neck low ARSST_Cells“Long Neck” low φ ARSST Cells


Closed Cell ARSST Insulation Options

Closed Cell ARSST Insulation Options Closed Cell ARSST Insulation Options 2 Closed Cell ARSST Insulation Options 3


Closed Cell ARSST:  Sample Addition

Closed Cell ARSST Sample Addition


Closed Cell ARSST: Pressure Balancing

                   Closed Cell ARSST Pressure Balancing Automatic (VSP)    Closed Cell ARSST Pressure Balancing Manual (JPB)                                                              Automatic (VSP)                                                                  Manual (JPB)

Examples of Closed Cell ARSST Data:

  1. 25% Vazo 67 in toluene
  2. Luperox 531 M80
  3. Vapor pressure (P-T data)
  4. Butyl Acrylate - Fire exposure
  5. 0.5% AIBN in Butyl Acrylate: Induction time
  6. 25% di-t amyl peroxide in pentadecane


Example 1. ARSST Closed (vac) vs. Open (300 psi)

ARSST Closed (vac) ARSST Open
  • 9 g 25% Vazo 67 in Toluene (too much)
  • Closed 10 ml “long neck” glass test cell
  • Heat at 2°C/min, external 300 psi pressure, rupture at 190°C (see also DIERS Spring 2006 LV)


Example 2. ARSST Screening for Energetic Decomposition

ARSST Screening for Energetic Decomposition
  •  Used “saved” 2°C/min calibration polynomial
  •  9 ml sample (open 10 ml cell) scans at 2°C/min
  •  3 ml sample (closed 5 ml cell) scans at 6°C/min
  •  => Both cases shatter test cell


Example 2. Open and Closed Cell ARSST

Open and Closed Cell ARSST

  • Rapid closed cell screening (6C/min) for decomposition and comparison to standard (2C/min) open cell test


Example 3. P-T Data

   Closed Cell ARSST EX 3

  • Used half-full test cells (closed)
  • Started at vacuum, but with external pressure
  • Heat at 2°C/min (PID mode)

Example 4. Closed cell BA tests in ARSSTTM & VSP2TM

              Closed Cell BA Tests in ARSST VSP2 Closed Cell BA Tests in ARSST VSP2

  • Fire exposure ARSST simulation and comparison to VSP2 test
  • ARSST test (uninhibited BA, 10 g in 20 ml cell) started at 1 atm N2
  • Developed pressure leak (into cell) late after exotherm


Example 5. Closed cell AIBN/BA Induction Tests 

Closed cell AIBN BA Induction Tests 

Closed Cell Tests In ARSST VSP2

  • Adiabatic hold (induction) tests on butyl acrylate with 0.5% AIBN
  • ARSST (9.9g in 20 ml cell) started with 1 atm N2 pressure
  • Heater power “dialed back” when sample reached target 50°C

2°C/min heater calibration → 0°C/min calibration

2 C min heater calibrationExample 6. Closed cell tests in ARSST & VSP2

Closed Cell Tests

Closed Cell Tests 2

  • 25% di-t amyl peroxide in pentadecane                     
  • ARSST test (8.8 g in 20 ml cell) starts at vacuum, has series of adiabatic hold steps, heater power tuned at 50, 80, 100C


If you are interested in more information on ARSST, dig deeper with out white paper on quick hazard screen by closed cell ARSST using standard ARC bombs below.


Quick Hazard Screening by Closed Cell ARSST Using Standard ARC Bombs

Topics: ARSST, DIERS, Adiabatic Calorimetry


Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now