Combustible Dust Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify dust explosion & reactivity hazards

Flammable Gas & Vapor Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify explosion hazards for vapor and gas mixtures

Chemical Reactivity Testing

Laboratory testing to quantify reactive chemical hazards, including the possibility of material incompatibility, instability, and runaway chemical reactions

DIERS Methodology

Design emergency pressure relief systems to mitigate the consequences of unwanted chemical reactivity and account for two-phase flow using the right tools and methods

Deflagrations (Dust/Vapor/Gas)

Properly size pressure relief vents to protect your processes from dust, vapor, and gas explosions

Effluent Handling

Pressure relief sizing is just the first step and it is critical to safety handle the effluent discharge from an overpressure event

Thermal Stability

Safe storage or processing requires an understanding of the possible hazards associated with sensitivity to variations in temperature

UN-DOT

Classification of hazardous materials subject to shipping and storage regulations

Safety Data Sheets

Develop critical safety data for inclusion in SDS documents

Biological

Model transport of airborne virus aerosols to guide safe operations and ventilation upgrades

Radioactive

Model transport of contamination for source term and leak path factor analysis

Fire Analysis

Model transport of heat and smoke for fire analysis

Flammable or Toxic Gas

transport of flammable or toxic gas during a process upset

OSS consulting, adiabatic & reaction calorimetry and consulting

Onsite safety studies can help identify explosibility and chemical reaction hazards so that appropriate testing, simulations, or calculations are identified to support safe scale up

Mechanical, Piping, and Electrical

Engineering and testing to support safe plant operations and develop solutions to problems in heat transfer, fluid flow, electric power systems

Battery Safety

Testing to support safe design of batteries and electrical power backup facilities particularly to satisfy UL9540a ed.4

Hydrogen Safety

Testing and consulting on the explosion risks associated with devices and processes which use or produce hydrogen

Spent Fuel

Safety analysis for packaging, transport, and storage of spent nuclear fuel

Decommissioning, Decontamination and Remediation (DD&R)

Safety analysis to underpin decommissioning process at facilities which have produced or used radioactive nuclear materials

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Bespoke testing and modeling services to validate analysis of DD&R processes

Nuclear Overview

Our Nuclear Services Group is recognized for comprehensive evaluations to help commercial nuclear power plants operate efficiently and stay compliant.

Severe Accident Analysis and Risk Assessment

Expert analysis of possible risk and consequences from nuclear plant accidents

Thermal Hydraulics

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Environmental Qualification (EQ) and Equipment Survivability (ES)

Testing and analysis to ensure that critical equipment will operate under adverse environmental conditions

Laboratory Testing & Software Capabilities

Testing and modeling services to support resolution of emergent safety issues at a power plant

Adiabatic safety calorimeters (ARSST and VSP2)

Low thermal inertial adiabatic calorimeters specially designed to provide directly scalable data that are critical to safe process design

Other Lab Equipment (DSC/ARC supplies, CPA, C80, Super Stirrer)

Products and equipment for the process safety or process development laboratory

FERST

Software for emergency relief system design to ensure safe processing of reactive chemicals, including consideration of two-phase flow and runaway chemical reactions

FATE

Facility modeling software mechanistically tracks transport of heat, gasses, vapors, and aerosols for safety analysis of multi-room facilities

Blog

Our highly experienced team keeps you up-to-date on the latest process safety developments.

Process Safety Newsletter

Stay informed with our quarterly Process Safety Newsletters sharing topical articles and practical advice.

Resources

With over 40 years of industry expertise, we have a wealth of process safety knowledge to share.

Recent Posts

Close Encounters of the AHJ Kind: Combustible Dust and the Authority Having Jurisdiction, P1

Posted by The Fauske Team on 01.08.14

Close Encounters of the AHJ Kind: Combustible Dust and the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), Part 1, by Tim Cullina, Senior Consulting Engineer, Fauske & Associates, LLC. 

Male Plant Manager resized 600When it comes to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) combustible dust standards, just who is the “authority having jurisdiction” and just how much authority do they have anyway?

The term “authority having jurisdiction,” commonly referred to as AHJ, is deliberately vague and covers a variety of organizations, not all of them governmental. By NFPA 654 definition, the authority having jurisdiction is "An organization, office, or individual responsible for enforcing the requirements of a code or standard, or for approving equipment, materials, an installation, or a procedure." 

That's fairly broad authority, and generally speaking, more than any single government office or agency usually maintains. Since agencies, offices, bureaus, and their responsibilities vary from town to town and state to state, the appropriate AHJ for a particular issue may be the building department or town engineer in one municipality and the fire chief or an elected official in another.  NFPA makes this uncontrolled variability a bit more clear in the annex to each of the combustible standards. 

In the annex to NFPA 654 for example, NFPA states: "Where public safety is primary, the authority having jurisdiction may be a federal, state, local, or other regional department or individual such as a fire chief; fire marshal; chief of a fire prevention bureau, labor department, or health department; building official; electrical inspector; or others having statutory authority."   Chances are good that you may have two or more AHJs in your local government, with others lurking at the state or federal levels.  Typically, these are the "permit people" that I like to call AHJs of the first kind.  They may not be familiar with your applicable NFPA standards, especially if you are a "one of a kind" enterprise in their jurisdiction, but that does not reduce their authority.  It simply adds emphasis to your responsibility.

The NFPA 654 annex reference goes on further to state: "For insurance purposes, an insurance inspection department, rating bureau, or other insurance company representative may be the authority having jurisdiction." In addition, NFPA identifies that, "In many circumstances, the property owner or his or her designated agent assumes the role of the authority having jurisdiction...".  These are your "non-governmental, doing-business" AHJs. I call these AHJs of the second kind.  Similar to the permit people mentioned previously, they may or may not be familiar with your applicable NFPA standards.

There is yet a third kind of AHJ; the inspectors. Typically, inspectors work for either the "permit" or "doing-business" AHJs, but not always. In a perfect world, they act as the guardians of both the public and private interests.  This group includes OSHA and the most powerful AHJ of them all, which I will address later in this series.  And no, it is not the NFPA.   

OSHA is an AHJ of this third kind. But, just like all the others, restricted to the limits of their authority and just like all the others, to the limits of their knowledge.  OSHA does not issue permits, like an AHJ of the first kind. It is not OSHA's place to "approve equipment, materials, an installation, or a procedure", like an AHJ of the second kind. (Fie to any company that advertises "OSHA-approved" products.) However, OSHA does enforce workplace safety standards.  Since many safety standards, such as Hazard Communications, are performance-oriented standards that overlap with NFPA standards, OSHA has a mandate to evaluate, whether equipment, materials, installations, and procedures help or hinder workplace safety. 

The most powerful AHJ is not EPA, even though it is an AHJ of all three kinds.  The most powerful AHJ, is the corporation, business owner, sole proprietor - essentially the "head honcho" in your organization.  Typically, that authority and the bounds of its jurisdiction are divided and distributed across the organization.  Few organizations divvy up the authority exactly the same way.  So looking at a chart of AHJs, of any kind, is like looking into a fun-house mirror.  Isn't it Pogo who said, "We have seen the enemy, and he is us."

In the next blog, I will continue with "Sleeping with Enemy: Combustible Dust and the Authorities having Jurisdiction (AHJ), Part 2".

In the mean time, consider the value that Fauske and Associates, LLC, (FAI) can provide to your efforts navigating applicable NFPA, OSHA, and EPA standards.  Our experts in Combustible Dust Explosion and Fire Hazard Evaluation, Process Hazard Analysis (PHA), Hazard Identification Risk Analysis, Consequence Analysis, Safer Process Scale-up, Process Safety Program Development, and Relief System Design Review are always here to help.  For more information, please contact Jeff Griffin at griffin@fauske.com or 630-887-5278. 

Topics: Combustible dust, Flammability hazard, NFPA 652, NFPA 68, NFPA 69, hazard identification, AHJ

cta-bg.jpg

Is My Dust Combustible?

A Flowchart To Help You Decide
Download Now